I am greatly concerned about the steady erosion of the America I was born into and the polarization of society. I used to think liberals were a healthy balance to our culture and now I see what they have done to America and other cultures throughout the world. I fear we are at the doorstep of another civil war and it will be a repeat of the Weimar Republic where conservative Christian capitalist battled Socialist unionist through the streets of Germany for years.
I am humbled by the immense support from thousands of concerned Veterans and Patriots all across America as we officially launched Special Operations for America (SOFA). It is a true honor. My pledge remains to ensure the voices of our military and Special Operations community are heard during this critical time in our Country’s history. Some suggest that any criticism of the President or his policies is unfair or even “treasonous.” Exposing the truth is never treasonous. As Chairman, I commit that SOFA will always be respectful to the Office of the President while making compelling arguments for why President Obama must be defeated. For those who have taken an oath to defend our Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, I ask you to once again do your duty and be vigilant, informed, and engaged. Our senior advisory board is composed of former military and business leaders who share a common interest of putting the interests of America ahead of party politics. We welcome well-researched arguments from both sides and pledge to represent the time-honored American military values of duty, honor, and country. God Bless America and all those who have sworn to defend her.
WSI: What is now being planned for the United States is not regime change – but the final implementation… and to use the words of the man calling himself Obama, the fundamental transformation of the United States of America that can only be assured by a second presidential term.
That plan to ensure a second Obama term as it has been titled, is to take place “By Any Means Necessary”.
UM: (To Military Insider) Is that how you would describe this? A “fundamental transformation” – something to take place by any means necessary?
MI: I would call it an operation reaching its intended conclusion – yes.
UM: And what is that conclusion – what does America look like after Barack Obama’s second term?
MI: -Name deleted- is right. Review what took place in Brazil. That is a working model for the Obama administration. Or Argentina right after 2001.
WSI: Excellent example there –Argentina. That is exactly what is being attempted by those who placed Obama in power. Argentina. Argentina, Kirchner, the recent auto bailouts – for those with open eyes the parallels are far too familiar to be mere coincidence.
MI: We were warning State about Argentina and Venezuela…well over ten years ago. The threat it posed to the entire region. The 5th Republic in the 1990s, Kirchner’s massive expansion of government control following their own economic collapse…that should sound familiar.
WSI: Kirchner has not been nearly so dangerous as his wife – what she has initiated in the last few years. Again, I would strongly suggest you study the parallels between that country and our own.
UM: For the sake of the readers I have to ask – who is Kirchner and the wife?
I found this at The Future of Freedom Foundation and it is a chronology of how Hitler took power in Germany written by Jacob Hornberger in 2004. It bears eerie resemblances to how the One Who Calls Himself Obama is operating today. I do wish voters who are convinced that there is no way he could be reelected would wake up and realize that to a dedicated enemy of this country, nothing is impossible.........................................................................
"Whenever U.S. officials wish to demonize someone, they inevitably compare him to Adolf Hitler. The message immediately resonates with people because everyone knows that Hitler was a brutal dictator.
But how many people know how Hitler actually became a dictator? My bet is, very few. I’d also bet that more than a few people would be surprised at how he pulled it off, especially given that after World War I Germany had become a democratic republic.
The story of how Hitler became a dictator is set forth in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, by William Shirer, on which this article is based.
In the presidential election held on March 13, 1932, there were four candidates: the incumbent, Field Marshall Paul von Hindenburg, Hitler, and two minor candidates, Ernst Thaelmann and Theodore Duesterberg. The results were:
Hindenburg 49.6 percent
Hitler 30.1 percent
Thaelmann 13.2 percent
Duesterberg 6.8 percent
At the risk of belaboring the obvious, almost 70 percent of the German people voted against Hitler, causing his supporter Joseph Goebbels, who would later become Hitler’s minister of propaganda, to lament in his journal, “We’re beaten; terrible outlook. Party circles badly depressed and dejected.”
As the Lame-Stream media only seems capable of yakking about how we need stonger gun control laws, this little news tidbit came to me via HP and FreeNC. It seems there was an earlier shooting in Colorado where an armed citizen sitting in church took down a man who interrupted the service and started shooting.
Unfortunately for the folks at Batman, the movie theater had a no lawful carry policy and so no one in the audience appears to have been able to defend themselves.
I do not know any person with a concealed carry permit who does not wish he or she could have been sitting in the audience in Aurora this past week. Things would have turned out very differently. Many innocent lives would have been saved not sacrificed by idiotic stronger gun laws.
You see thats the difference between people with concealed carry permits and people who want stronger gun laws. We have a strong sense of justice and want to see it happen even at the possible cost of our own lives. We don't wish we could shoot someone, we wish we could live in a society where we did not have to. We also wish we can help to save innocent lives and we know without a doubt that the best way to achieve this is to have every law-abiding citizen armed as much as legally possible.
None of the gun violence is cause by lawful gun users. It is caused by liberals who stupidly think they can disarm everyone and only then we will have their version of utopia. They only succeed in disarming the peaceful law-abiding citizen. The nut jobs will always find a way to cause misery and mayhem no matter what the law is.
For the first time in over two years of ongoing interviews, a powerful and highly influential Wall Street insider allows for direct interview participation of a figure we will simply call “Military Insider”. What follows is the first of a two part interview with both of these individuals who are warning of an impending manufactured crisis within the United States by powers desperate to secure a second term for “the man calling himself Obama”. For those who have followed these insider interviews from the beginning – you know just how accurate they have proven to be. Please remind yourself of that as you read this latest discussion............................
repost from Ulsterman on July 19, 2012................................
UM: Can we begin?
WSI: (Broad smile) Yes – and might I just say this before we do…it is so very nice to see you again in person.
UM: I’m just as glad to see you looking so much better. Out of the woods?
WSI: No-no…at my age one is always “in the woods” if you will. But at this point, I’m not helping to fertilize the trees just yet! (laughs)
Read more in News
« “Food Poisoning”“President Obama – You’re Killing Us Out Here” »
UM: Why did you decide to invite him here? I’m glad – honored, to have them here, but can you explain…briefly explain why you’ve done this?
WSI: Certainly. I invited…I guess that term is sufficient…I invited them here for no other reason than to have what they know and what their experience tells them – I wanted that perspective to now be included in this from the first person. I…we…-name deleted- and I decided it would be best, when possible, to have this information come to you without the filter of our own interpretations.
UM: How long have you known each other?
WSI: (Looks over at MI) That would be…nearly twenty years? Perhaps a bit more?
MI: Twenty three years.
WSI: That long? Really?
MI: Just over twenty-three years. That’s correct.
UM: Have you known –name deleted- that long as well?
WSI: I introduced them…it wasn’t more than a few years ago. Shortly after the election…in 2008. Shortly after –name deleted- told me there had been a terrible mistake made. That Obama being elected had been a terrible mistake. Then I began hearing similar things from him…the concern that was…mounting within the military and intelligence community regarding the new president.
UM: Can you expand on that? Those concerns. What were they?
WSI: You’ve already – we’ve already been down that path. A number of times.
UM: I’d like to hear it from him. If that’s ok. Their perspective. Unfiltered. Like you just said you wanted.
(Military Insider looks at WSI).............................................
(Read the entire interview)
by JOEL B. POLLAK 13 Jul 2012,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
The mainstream media has been repeating--without any criticism, context, or opposing view--Sen. Harry Reid's claim that Mitt Romney could not be confirmed by the U.S. Senate to serve in the Cabinet--or even to serve as "dog catcher"--because he has only released his most recent tax returns, not his entire tax history. The story currently leads major news websites, including National Public Radio's hourly news update. So it seems appropriate to do what the media will not: apply Reid's "dog catcher" standard to Barack Obama.
Let us first take the question of whether Barack Obama would have been confirmed by the Senate for any position, Cabinet or otherwise. If his lack of experience was not a sufficient obstacle, his past history of serious drug use--which is even worse than the admissions in his memoir, Dreams from My Father--would have barred his nomination. So, too, would his radical past, including his associations with Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Rashid Khalidi, Derrick Bell, and a host of extremists with whom he made common cause.
On the tax issue, it is worth reminding Sen. Reid (and the media) that several of President Obama's nominees for the Cabinet did, in fact, have very serious tax problems--and were confirmed anyway (though at least one, with a sense of humility lacking in her colleagues, withdrew). The most notorious is "TurboTax" Tim Geithner, who outrageously blamed a computer program for his failure to pay self-employment taxes while he was working for the International Monetary Fund. He was confirmed anyway, under considerable pressure from the mainstream media (and after an inexcusable capitulation by Senate Republicans), which painted Geithner as the only person who could possibly be qualified to run the U.S. Treasury in crisis.
It is also worth noting that Sen. Reid's best hope for maintaining his job is to see Elizabeth Warren unseat Republican Sen. Scott Brown in Massachusetts. But Warren's candidacy is only possible because she could not receive confirmation from the U.S. Senate for the leadership of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, to which Obama desperately wanted to appoint her--not just because Republicans oppose the agency's powers, but because of her own radicalism. Now that she has been revealed to have lied, apparently about her Native American heritage, there is no possible way she could be confirmed for a Cabinet position, or any other requiring the approval of Congress. Yet Reid and Obama are counting on her.
So the "dog catcher" standard that Sen. Harry Reid has sought to apply to Romney--and which he has, with the mainstream media's help, succeeded in applying to Romney--would have prevented Obama and his own nominees from taking office. But the media has not applied Reid's standard to Obama, because the media almost always applies a double standard to Democrats and Republicans--especially so with Barack Obama. (Update: And would a man who confessed to eating dog meat be made dog catcher? I think not.)
To take only one of hundreds of examples of that double standard, in the 2000 campaign, Republican Sen. John McCain released thousands of pages of his medical records; he did so again (albeit only for a few hours) in 2008. But then-Senator Obama released a single page--the equivalent of an elementary school "doctor's note"--and the media meekly accepted his release gratefully.
Case closed--and a man who had never held any position of serious responsibility in the public or private sector--neither dog catcher nor anything else--went on to win.
DECLARE YOUR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE U.N. GUN BAN TREATY TODAY!
As a sovereign and free citizen of the United States of America, I hereby declare my independence from any United Nations treaty that would strip me of my constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms. I further resolve to fight back against any international scheme designed to destroy my freedom to purchase, own, carry and use a firearm.
Add my name to this Declaration!
When the Muslim Brotherhood gained power in Egypt, I jokingly said to my wife, "I wonder how long it will take them to bulldoze the Pyramids or Sphinx ?" Now we learn Saudi and Bahrain leaders are in it too. I suppose that is why they tried to hide a 4th century Christian church that was discovered in KSA also. What the western world doesn't seem to understand yet is that to most muslims anything not Islamic is "Haram",forbidden. That means YOU too white boy and everything you stand for.
From Atlas Shrugs....."According to several reports in the Arab media, prominent Muslim clerics have begun to call for the demolition of Egypt's Great Pyramids—or, in the words of Saudi Sheikh Ali bin Said al-Rabi'i, those "symbols of paganism," which Egypt's Salafi party has long planned to cover with wax. Most recently, Bahrain's "Sheikh of Sunni Sheikhs" and President of National Unity, Abd al-Latif al-Mahmoud, called on Egypt's new president, Muhammad Morsi, to "destroy the Pyramids and accomplish what Amr bin al-As could not."
There are only two reasons why the Pyramids have survived through centuries of Muslim domination in Egypt: because the Egyptians have lacked the technology to destroy them, and because they bring in tourist money. The Islamic supremacists who have just come to power in Egypt view the Pyramids the way the Taliban viewed the Buddhas of Bamiyan: as idolatrous leftovers from the time of jahiliyya, the pre-Islamic period of ignorance. Pre-Islamic archaelogical artifacts in Muslim countries all over the world are treated with contempt and allowed to fall into decay and disrepair, because Islam places no value upon any human achievement that is outside Islam's purview.
Now that the Muslim Brotherhood is in power in Egypt, you better book your ticket fast if you want to go see the Pyramids -- and the Sphinx, too, for that matter.
One step at a time, thats how how its being done, hoping you won't see your rights being stripped away until its too late. With the Senate now set to sign the UN Small Arms treaty, once Hillary and Obama sign it, the Second Amendment to the US Constitution will be null and void, leading the way to gun registration and confiscation.http://www.examiner.com/article/senate-set-to-approve-controversial-un-gun-treaty. Does any thinking person in America not understand what the term Progressive means in American politics yet? Why are we allowing elected officials empowered to enforce "the will of the people" to rip the Constitution to shreds before our eyes and not do anything about it? Why don't we just elect Hugo Chavez next and speed things up?
July 7, 2012. - The president of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, called for the progressive movements of the Latin American left, meeting in Caracas, to deepen the action plan to drive real change and not global hegemony of capitalism prevails.
Chavez insisted that "the political question goes to the left but has to go beyond the left", and therefore he added that "we must create material and spiritual conditions to create the new world."
He said that from his view, is winning the historic Battle of the transition to socialism, and at this point he said that "I do not mean the election, but something much more important the historic Battle of the transition to the world new in Venezuela. "
He also indicated that more than ever, there are conditions for international-socialist offensive.
"There are the angry, the youth of France, Greece, Chicago (United States). Israel came up to the indignant. We will give you greetings of solidarity to the indignant of this world and the new movements of the youths who have started a fight against the devil, as the media, repression, "he said.
In this regard, the Head of State said that the peoples of the world "are in what someone called heroic impulse."
"Today, without triumphalism and humility, we might say that Latin America and progressive governments are at the forefront of humanism," he added.
In the closing ceremony of the XVIII Sao Paulo Forum, political parties, social movements and organizations in the world left, agreed to declare July 24 as World Day of Solidarity with the Bolivarian Revolution and organize a global twittazo through the @ chavezcandanga account in August.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
LET THE SIGNING OF THIS TREATY BE A GENERAL CALL TO ARMS - that should it be executed without the will and consent of the People of these several States, that the People must and shall immediately and henceforth withdraw all consent to be governed by such a caste of self-serving tyrants, and to plainly declare that said caste of tyrants are beyond any authority, law, or protection of our Constitution, for they have forsaken it’s blessings, and waged war against it, and against the People whose shelter it has been and shall continue to be.
WE WILL NOT COMPLY – WE WOULD RATHER ACT WITH SWIFT AND JUST FORCE, RISKING ALL, THAN TO SUMBMIT AND SURRENDER ALL. SURRENDER IS FOR COWARDS – THEREFORE, LET THOSE WHO WOULD VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION SURRRENDER, WHILE THEY YET HAVE TIME TO DO SO…
THE TIME FOR WARNINGS HAS PASSED
I have been meaning to give a nod to a SF brother who runs the mountain guerrilla blog. Sorry to take so long JM. He writes some really good training programs on his site and from what I can see runs some very good tactical schools for shooters.
You guys who haven't checked him out yet should do so at Nous Defions.http://mountainguerrilla.blogspot.com/
From John Mosby at Nous Defions.........I plead guilty. I am guilty of an egregious sin of omission, for which I owe every reader of this blog (especially those SF veterans I know are reading it and critiquing their young protege), a profound apology. I am guilty of the sin of hubris. You see, one of the critical lessons pounded into young Special Forces candidates' heads during the Q-Course (at least when I went through JFKSWCS, and I assume still) is that, besides all the cool tactical training and gunfighter schooling, you have a moral obligation to make sure the host nation (HN) forces you are training/advising know, understand, and practice, the Law of Land Warfare. I placed too much faith in the inherent morality of the American patriot movement.
There is an old cliche that there are no rules in a war. That is, to put it as mildly as I am capable, utter nonsense. Every war, from Cain and Abel's sibling rivalry, until today, has been moderated by rules. Too often, throughout history, of course, there have been acts committed that, anyone but Satan himself would agree were crimes against humanity. Even our own nation's military has committed these. The legal crutch of precedence however, does not justify these acts, for they are unjustifiable. It certainly does not justify future actions of immorality by any so-called Liberty Resistance Movement, whose sole claim to legitimacy can be said to be the moral high ground.
There are seven basic legal principles that are supposed to bind any and all actions by contemporary U.S. military forces. They are:
Observances of fundamental human rights will recognize the dignity and worth of the individual and the fundamental freedom of all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion. Human rights violations will not be tolerated. As with violations of the law of war, U.S. soldiers will report human rights violations when they become aware of them.
Civilians shall be treated humanely and may not be used to shield military operations.
EPWs (Enemy Prisoners of War) and civilian detainees will be treated humanely and IAW (In Accordance With) the provisions of the Geneva Conventions.
U.S. soldiers are entitled to similar humane treatment should they fall into the enemy's hands.
Orders to commit war crimes are illegal and must be disobeyed.
Soldiers who violate the law of war will be held responsible for their actions. Superiors who order violations of the law of war are criminally and personally responsible for such orders, as are subordinates who carry out the orders.
Weapons, munitions, and techniques calculated to cause unnecessary pain and suffering are forbidden.
A short time ago, Iran 's Supreme Leader Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei urged the Muslim World to boycott anything and everything that originates with the Jewish people.
In response, Meyer M. Treinkman, a pharmacist, out of the kindness of his heart, offered to assist them in their boycott as follows:
"Any Muslim who has Syphilis must not be cured by Salvarsan discovered by a Jew, Dr. Ehrlich. He should not even try to find out whether he has Syphilis, because the Wasserman Test is the discovery of a Jew. If a Muslim suspects that he has Gonorrhea, he must not seek diagnosis, because he will be using the method of a Jew named Neissner.
"A Muslim who has heart disease must not use Digitalis, a discovery by a Jew, Ludwig Traube.
Should he suffer with a toothache, he must not use Novocaine, a discovery of the Jews, Widal and Weil.
If a Muslim has Diabetes, he must not use Insulin, the result of research by Minkowsky, a Jew.
If one has a headache, he must shun Pyramidon and Antypyrin, due to the Jews, Spiro and Ellege.
Muslims with convulsions must put up with them because it was a Jew, Oscar Leibreich, who proposed the use of Chloral Hydrate.
Arabs must do likewise with their psychic ailments because Freud, father of psychoanalysis, was a Jew.
Should a Muslim child get Diphtheria, he must refrain from the "Schick" reaction which was invented by the Jew, Bella Schick.
"Muslims should be ready to die in great numbers and must not permit treatment of ear and brain damage, work of Nobel Prize winner, Robert Baram.
They should continue to die or remain crippled by Infantile Paralysis because the discoverer of the anti-polio vaccine is a Jew, Jonas Salk.
"Muslims must refuse to use Streptomycin and continue to die of Tuberculosis because a Jew, Zalman Waxman, invented the wonder drug against this killing disease.
Muslim doctors must discard all discoveries and improvements by dermatologist Judas Sehn Benedict, or the lung specialist, Frawnkel, and of many other world renowned Jewish scientists and medical experts.
"In short, good and loyal Muslims properly and fittingly should remain afflicted with Syphilis, Gonorrhea, Heart Disease, Headaches, Typhus, Diabetes, Mental Disorders, Polio Convulsions and Tuberculosis and be proud to obey the Islamic boycott."
Meanwhile I ask, what medical contributions to the world have the Muslims made?
What was that???? I'm still listening...............
from Susan-----Couldn't find it in my old Webster's dictionary so I Googled it and discovered it is a recently "coined" new word found on T-shirts on eBay: Read this one over slowly and absorb the facts that are within this definition! I love this word and believe that it will become a recognized English word. Finally, a word to describe our current political situation...
from Sultan Knish------------
"There is no more neutrality in the world," said Black Panther leader, civil rights activist and fun-loving rapist; Eldridge Cleaver. "You either have to be part of the solution, or you're going to be part of the problem-- there ain't no more middle ground."
We live in Eldridge Cleaver's world now, a world with no more middle ground. Where not doing anything does not mean you will be left alone. This is no longer a nation founded on the curious premise that the government should leave people alone unless they are causing problems.
That peculiar idea was held by a nation of farmers and merchants who fled religious persecution, and whose great contribution to human history was the notion that governments shouldn't be all-powerful and that everyone should mind their own business when it comes to other people's affairs. Our present-day rulers revile them as racist slave owners who only cared about money, but they also happen to be racist slave owners who only care about money, and they have far more of both.
The average American still holds the fanciful belief that, if he isn't annoying anyone, he should be left alone. To the people running his country, this is as bizarre and unworkable as Phrenology or the Geocentric theory or handing out universal health care without also compelling everyone to buy it.
Found some good reading over at Eeben Barlow's blog;http://eebenbarlowsmilitaryandsecurityblog.blogspot.com/Like many of us Mr. Barlow saw active service in Africa's bush wars
and now teaches and consults. His knowledge may become more useful to
readers now that the US Supreme Court has allowed the federal government to
tax your very existence. The fact that you were born is God's will but now the
government can forcibly collect a tax on your existence. Your choice? Pay the tax or go to prison. This means YOU are now a slave and the US Constitution no longer
protects you. Enjoy your Hope and Change demoncrats.
"Governments that govern at the expense of the nation as opposed to governing for the nation place themselves in a position that will be rapidly exploited by aggrieved people and may ultimately result in a national uprising, a challenge to their authority or even into an insurgency.
Governments will inadvertently provide the insurgents with numerous advantages if they fail to take note of the above factors. These factors provide the insurgents with a fertile breeding ground for discontent and recruitment. With national and international media coverage and support, the insurgency will intensify and government reaction may result in both heavy-handed action and over-reaction.
Unlike a conventional war, a COIN conflict’s main effort is aimed at restoring faith in the government and redressing real or perceived wrongs against the populace who are partaking or supporting the insurgency. Failure to do so will simply fuel the insurgency.
When government’s failure is handed-down to the armed forces to “rectify”, the armed forces become the target of government pressure to resolve the situation as fast as possible as well as actions and propaganda by the insurgents who, by their very actions, get free publicity in the media for their cause."